Editorials for May 28, 2000  

  Open the Floodgates!  

I don't accept editorials in .doc format. We all understand? Good. I do accept them in the body of the e-mail (preferably with title and e-mail in the body), as a .txt attachment, or in HTML. If you do it in HTML, then PLEASE use the template located in the right-hand menu thing there. Do not HTML-ize with MS Word please, it doesn't really go over too well. So to recap, title, e-mail, and editorial in the body of the e-mail, in a text attachment, or in HTML using the template.

Now on to less unsultry topics than people not following instructions. I'm actually starting up the whole debate thing I spoke of last week. I'm going to put up abbreviated rules for those of you who want to join in. I am planning on having a demo-round (so you guys can see what it's like), and teach you folks/answer questions. I already have 5 people who want to do it, and if you want to see them do it for the first time, drop me an e-mail, and I'll give you the details (we're doing it tonight, Sunday). [Click Here for the LONG Rules]

Thanks to Scar as always for doing my dirty-work (the masochist). Thanks to Metallica for managing to turn themselves into the bad guys while getting into a fight they can't win. If you end up making the people you want to buy your CDs suffer, you're not going to end up making as much money as you used to. Of course, I'm no econ major...

Also, this past week editorial volume dropped through the floor. That means you don't get any. Not that I mind, it's a short little break, but I hope it picks back up. I'm guessing it's vacation/finals kicking everyone's butt. Good luck for all you folks still suffering through that. Read Mistress Nightshadow's editorial, and try to answer any one of those questions. That's your suggested theme/idea for next week's editorial.

Are you a...?

Good Grammar Editorial of the East

or a
Wicked Grammar Editorial of the West to be Spell-checked

The Last Word
May 23, 2000.
May 18, 2000.

Submission Guidelines

Like HTML? Please use me!

Editorial Template

Enter the Archives

  • Posted: 7
  • Inbox: 0
  • Yes: 0
  • Maybe: 0
  • Cumulative Flames: 14
  • highlight below
    - Joshua "Darien" Maciel

    I think people think I'm a webmaster. I'm not.

    New Editorials
    It is all in the Execution: My Two Cents Worth On Fanfics Chad Harger a.k.a Graeystone 5/28/2000
    Well, What if There Wasnít a Final Boss? Chris Politz 5/28/2000
    Aerith/Aeris -- Which is Right? Dustin Perrault 5/28/2000
    Art Ė a reply to Rebuttal to: "Squaresoft Isnít Fooling Me" Eternal Eclipse 5/28/2000
    Academic RPGs Mistress Nightshadow 5/28/2000
    Reply to: Square at the Pearly Gates Raincrystal 5/28/2000
    Judging a Book by its Cover Sheepieman 5/28/2000

    Angels in Games
    Square at the Ivory Gates: God and Angels in Squaresoft Titles Evan Jenkins 5/16/2000
    God in Japan, or Why Everyone Likes Sexy People With Wings Kris Wolfe 5/23/2000
    Response to "Square at the Ivory Gates: God and Angels in Squaresoft Titles" Rana Loreus 5/23/2000

    Change is Good
    Change is Good Chief Ug 5/16/2000
    Nothing Really Changes Anyway: A Response to Change is Good WMAdoy 5/23/2000

    Has Square Sold Out?
    SquareSoft Isn't Fooling Me Macaroni 4/26/2000
    FFVII... Has Squaresoft really sold out to the RPGamers? Nightshadow 5/16/2000
    Rebuttal to: "Squaresoft Isn't Fooling Me" Geoffrey Russell 5/23/2000

    <- Back
    © 1998-2017 RPGamer All Rights Reserved
    Privacy Policy